What is Dyspraxia?

Developmental Dyspraxia is often known by many different names, these include 'developmental co-ordination disorder', 'the hidden handicap', 'motor learning problems', 'minimal brain dysfunction', 'sensory integrative problems' and ‘perceptuo-motor dysfunction. Developmental Dyspraxia is thought to be a neurologically based disorder, a motor planning difficulty that is present from birth. It is believed to be an immaturity of the motor cortex part of the brain that prevents messages from being properly transmitted to the body. It is thought to affect up to one in 20 children. With boys identified four times more frequently than girls.

There are three types of Developmental Dyspraxia. Oral Dyspraxia,Verbal Dyspraxia and Motor Dyspraxia. Oral Dyspraxia affects children at the level of reproduction of movements of the mouth; children have a hard time making the correct movements with their mouth for the formation of words. Motor Dyspraxia can be seen to inhibit an individual from moving as planned, Motor Dyspraxia also effects the organization of sensory input. Verbal Dyspraxia causes children to have difficulties making sounds into words. Verbal Dyspraxia is often characterized by an individual’s difficulty in producing speech sounds and in sequencing them together into words. Expressive language is usually delayed. Often children with Verbal Dyspraxia are also diagnosed with oral or Motor Dyspraxia too. It is however, important to recognise the distinction between these different terms

Praxis and Dyspraxia

The term dyspraxia comes from the word praxis, which means 'doing or acting'. Praxis itself refers to the generation of volitional movement patterns for the performance of a particular action. It is the ability to select, plan, organize, and initiate the motor pattern that is the foundation of praxis. The term dyspraxia is used to describe a dysfunction of this praxis. Dyspraxia then is a disorder of praxis. It is a disorder of the process of ideation (where one forms an idea of using a known movement to achieve a planned purpose). It is a disorder of motor planning (where one plans the action needed to achieve the idea), and it is a disorder of execution (carrying out the planned movement).

Developmental Dyspraxia is often associated with problems of perception, language and thought and often manifests itself as a difficulty in different areas. Often these difficulties lie in the organization of the speech musculature (tongue, lips, palate, jaw, cheeks, throat muscles), and effect the voluntary production of sound. Oral Dyspraxia is thought to be a disorder of speech articulation, rather than a non-linguistic disorder. As such the manifestations of the disorder are seen and are involved in speech production and not in the understanding of language or the way we put words together in sentences. Even though this is so, the two latter problems can also be presenting any Dyspraxic case, especially when it comes to sentence production.

Effects of Dyspraxia.

Developmental Dyspraxia may affect any or all areas of development - physical, intellectual, emotional, social, language, and sensory - and may impair an individual’s normal process of learning. Each individual is affected in different ways, and to different degrees. Often Developmental Dyspraxia is inconsistent in that it may affect the individual one day but not the next.

Characteristics associated with Dyspraxia

There are many characteristics associated with dyspraxia some of which are listed below:

  • Poor balance and posture and sense of direction.

  • Poor fine and gross motor co-ordination; for example difficulties with throwing and catching a ball or difficulty hopping, skipping or riding a bike.

  • Poor awareness of body position in space.

  • Difficulties with vision.

  • Dyspraxic individuals use a lot of mime and gesture to communicate.

  • Tactile dysfunction.

  • Sensitive to touch, intolerance of having hair or teeth brushed, nails and hair cut, find some clothes uncomfortable.

  • Difficulty with reading, writing, speech.

  • Confused about which hand to use.

  • Poor social skills.

  • Emotional and behavioral problems.

  • Slow to learn to dress or feed themselves.

  • Phobias or obsessive behavior and impatient.

  • Children with dyspraxia can be of average or above average intelligence but are often behaviourally immature. They try hard to fit in to socially accepted behaviour when at school but often throw tantrums when at home.

  • Children with dyspraxia may find it difficult to understand logic and reason.

Characteristics associated with Dyspraxia

On the level of speech and language:

There are many speech and language characteristics associated with dyspraxia some of which are listed below:

  • Speech problems - slow to learn to speak and speech may be incoherent.

  • “Groping” or searching for the correct position of the tongue and lips. Seen in the way a child’s tongue may seem to go everywhere while he/she tries to find the correct position.

  • Presence of oral dyspraxia, the child cannot imitate oral movements of command eg: poking out tongue on demand.

  • Using a limited number of sounds.

  • Difficulty in producing sequences of sounds.

  • Inconsistency of output e.g. on 3 attempts of the word “dog” the child may say “bog”, “gog”, “dod”.

  • · Inability to voluntarily produce an isolated sound or sequence of sounds that have been produced before.

  • Discrepancy between sounds used in a spontaneous conversation and those that can be produced in isolation or on request.

  • The child may have no words, very few words, or up to 100 to 200 words in their vocabulary.

  • They are unlikely to be attempting to make more than a handful of 2-word combinations.

  • Some give the impression of struggling to talk, exhibiting trial and error attempts to say words, accompanied by great frustration.

  • Many of these children can UNDERSTAND LANGUAGE at a more advanced level than their limited speech would suggest.

Causes - theories

There are five main theories that attempt to explain the basis of dyspraxia.

  1. due to an auditory processing problem

  2. a very specific 'specific language impairment affecting language acquisition at the sound-syllable-prosody level

  3. due to an organisational problem with sequencing the movements required for speech

  4. due to a difficulty with making volitional movements for speech production

  5. due to various combinations of these factors

Treatment

From our studies and observations it seems that a combination of different therapies works well and benefits the child the most.

  • Tomatis Listening Program

  • Speech therapy

  • Occupational therapy for sensory- integration

  • Others

Case Studies

Tim’s Story

At age 3 Tim was diagnosed as dyspraxic, with a severe comprehension problem. His speech therapist referred him to the Tomatis Method. At the age of 2½ Tim wasn’t saying very much, he wasn’t able to understand the simple instructions that other children could of the same age. His parents were speaking Hebrew at home. There were a lot of tantrums and frustration, and he seemed to be relying on non-verbal communication such as high pitched screaming. Tim’s expressive and receptive skills were at least 12 to 18 months behind his age. At 3 years, he was not putting more than two words together and didn’t have consonants at the end of many words.

Tim completed the first 15-day Tomatis Listening Program in January 2001. Within the first 10 days his parents noticed some changes and by the end of the 3 weeks these changes were quite dramatic. He began to use much longer and more complex sentences. His vocabulary increased and he seemed to be aware if he said a word incorrectly. He would attempt the word a couple of times until he was able to pronounce it. Tim began to engage in more imaginative play. He was imitating scenes from children’s videos and was also reproducing a number of phrases and using them in the correct context. He was having fewer tantrums and there was very little high-pitched screaming. He was using his words more when playing with his sister and other children. Overall he seemed less frustrated due to the fact that he was able to express himself more freely. He appeared to be a more assertive and confident little boy.

After the initial 15-day program, Tim underwent two 8-day follow up programs, each 4 weeks apart. There were still changes to be noted; however these were subtler. He tended to ask many more questions, especially to ask permission using the phrase “Can I…” His level of comprehension improved, he began to cooperate more and he was also beginning to express his feelings. Socially, he began forming close friendships at Kindergarten and communicating well with his peers and teachers. He became better at sharing, asking to have turns and letting his friends know that he was finished and that they now could have a turn.

Tim’s Story - Françoise Nicoloff’s comment

In the initial consultation Tim’s mother told me of a death in her immediate family which occurred during pregnancy and also of a long birth. I was informed that Tim also had a few ear infections during his infancy these things can all have an effect on listening development. I learnt that Tim’s developmental milestones were on time except for language, which did not develop, as it should have.

If a child does not develop their language and communication skills while everything else seems normal, it is usually a sign of immaturity in the development of listening skills at the level of auditory processing. During this initial assessment it was found that Tim did not seem to be processing sounds with enough clarity and accuracy.

The diagnosis of Dyspraxia was also a sign of immaturity of the vestibular system, which is part of the inner ear, and also responsible for motor control, organisation of motor movement, motor planning, sensori-spatial perceptual skills and balance.

With the Tomatis Listening Program we had an immediate response with Tim who, after four hours of the Listening Program, was able to increase the length of his sentences. By improving his processing, the Tomatis Effect was immediately operative.

First Term at School 2003.
Report from Tim's mother

Tim had an amazing start to school- for a child who was very adamant about not going and wasn’t very interested in reading or writing. He thoroughly enjoyed going.

Tim settled into his new environment with ease. He tried very hard to be accepted with the boys. He learnt approximately 60 sight words and is able to read 99% of them with no difficulties. He is also able to retrieve more than 20 from his head and write them down and even write sentences without copying eg: “I can see my home”, or “I can jump”. Tim enjoys doing homework (he actually reminds his mother to do it) and they endeavour to revise his ‘words’ nearly every day. He happily reads from the little ‘reader’, which he is given from school each week. He is also more willing to do extra work from his speech therapist. He is obviously more mature and capable of doing more work , he simply wants to learn and he is proud of his achievements.

Tim’s drawings have improved immensely. There is definitely more detail, colour and imagination. He writes and draws at nearly every opportunity he gets – whether it is at home on paper, or on the white board, or the computer. The writing is clear and legible. He gets excited when he discovers that he can read words when he is in the supermarket or in the newspaper or a book that he has. He is definitely more confident with his speech and he often talks to himself (role playing with toys) repeating phrases his teacher uses. He doesn’t mind being corrected. His excellent visual memory has obviously helped him with his reading. Although his comprehension has improved, there is still a prominent delay with his comprehension and sometimes certain questions need to be reworded in order for him to understand them.

His speech therapists reports:

Tim’s process was speeded up with the Tomatis Method. After he started the Tomatis Method there was not the need to repeat instructions as frequently as before he was also able to complete activities upon first instruction. The TM helped to settle the neurological pathways. Before The Tomatis Listening Program he could only repeat 3 syllables at a time, afterwards this increased to 6. He had longer utterances, his sentences were comprised of many more words, and there were also more organisation in his sentences.

Chris’s story

Chris had a normal and uneventful birth, but afterwards he required a colostomy which was followed by several major surgical procedures. He had grommets inserted at age 3, because several middle ear infections left him with glue ear and a moderate hearing loss. At age 2 Chris wasn’t forming many words and didn’t seem to understand simple commands and was referred to a Speech Pathologist.

He was diagnosed with receptive and expressive dyspraxia. Chris’s speech pathologist recommended his parents ‘help’ him to communicate and give him encouragement to do so by using some simple sign language. In spite of this Chris was not progressing well with speech and language development and he also had some physical challenges, such as low muscle tone and fine motor difficulties. Chris was left handed like his mother – he could not put his sandals on, and although he was dressing himself he was not good at orienting his clothes or shoes, he was also not riding a bicycle or catching a ball

The speech therapist recommended the Tomatis Method in October 2001, when Chris was almost 4, saying she’d seen improvement in children with Chris’s difficulties. His mother being an occupational therapist was a great believer in early intervention, so Chris started Tomatis immediately.

The Mother reported “After the second day of Tomatis, this child who had never really said much, and never formed a meaningful sentence asked me clearly in a Delicatessen, Mum, are you going to have carrots today? I looked down, in such shock, and then he proceeded to tell the shopkeeper that I wouldn’t have carrots on my sandwich today. It’s hard to explain to a Delicatessen worker why you are crying over your son asking you if you want carrots!”

After a year of Tomatis, 8 sessions in all, Chris was transformed into a sociable, confident, talkative boy. He attended the Transition class at Scots College Prep, and the teachers commented on the great improvement they saw during the year.

At almost 5, Chris began to take a great interest in books and stories, and began trying to sound out some of words. He was also starting to take note of his surroundings, and to remember landmarks and things from the past such as roads he once travelled on.

Chris’s motor skills also showed signs of improvement, there was more coordination in his running and climbing, his writing and fine motor activities were also improving.

The Tomatis programs continued and Chris continued to show improvements in many areas. The gains became less obvious as he reached age appropriate abilities in some areas, but his parents still see the benefits of persevering with the program.

There is also a feeling that Chris senses the benefit as well!

He knows when he needs the program and asks his parents when he is going back.

Chris’s story – Françoise Nicoloff’s comment

Chris was nearly 4 when I first saw him for the initial assessment. He would speak to his mother softly but not directly to me. Occasionally he would use a deaf talk sort of voice. He could only put 5-6 words together and could not say long sentences. Chris had no social communication with his peers at preschool where he had been badly bullied, kicked and punched. He tried to express himself but couldn't, his speech was muffled and not articulated at all.

On the first day of the TLP, it was like we had found the key to unlocking Chris’s world or as Chris’s father said “it has been like someone has lifted a veil from over him.” At the end of the first 30 hours, Chris’s father reported: “It’s a miracle! Chris has started to interact and initiate conversation with other children in the park. He goes to them and says: Hello, my name is Chris and what is yours?” Chris is more assertive with his father. “He shouts at me” says the father, “in the past; he would just start to whinge or to cry.” Consultations with Chris’s mother were important to help her to focus on the positive aspects of her son’s progress, which meant a reflection on her side about the way she viewed Chris.

Chris’s program was designed according to his parents’ feedback, his tests and his speech therapists observations.

First Term at school in 2003, Chris’s mother reports:

Now Chris is able to ride a bicycle, he can swim, snorkel and catch a ball. He is definitely involved in school activities and very involved in his projects He wants to learn and tell all about his work. He is interested in signs and wants to read and to spell.

The family moved to QLD last Xmas and he is settling beautifully in to his new environment, his new school. His parents report he is very motivated. He still has poor motor control at the level of his mouth; he still dribbles at times and can be unconscious of the way he is eating. (It is still a sign of vestibular dysfunction. How can this be addressed?)

His mother recently reported that Chris loves writing; he carries a booklet and pen around the house and is constantly writing things down. E.g. “this morning he came to the breakfast table with his pen and pad and asked me how to spell breakfast and promptly wrote it down!” He is taking delight in his recent achievements - probably the single most exciting thing for his parents is when his little face lights up at his new abilities! Chris loves maps- he likes to try and work out where he is going on a map. He enjoys the computer and is quite efficient with kindergarten standard games. He can count to 100. Chris has taken a real interest in reading, a lot of it comes from the sight words he has become so familiar with, but still, that's reading! Chris’s speech is still a little regressed - mixes words up a bit like remember “bremember” remote control “mote troll”, uses 'f' sounds instead of “th” again and some words 'run' together.

Physically he has taken a bit of an interest in ball games - much more than ever before, he loves to bounce and catch balls and occasionally kicks the ball around! Chris is singing all the time!

His parents say that every day “their hearts 'sing' when they see or hear Chris conquer something new that gives him so much pleasure. They report that they feel the majority of this is attributed to Tomatis. “I always remember back to that first day after Tomatis when that little boy who hardly strung two words together asked me if I wanted carrots on my salad sandwich...it all took off from that moment!” says his mother reports his mother.

Very often at the end of the assessment I ask parents to do an ear candle treatment before starting the program.

What the speech therapist says

Before the TLP, voice production was impossible for Chris, after completing a number of programs he started getting into the “nuance” of the voice sounds, for example: coming (sounding) from the front of the mouth instead of at the back (as from the front and from the back are quite different mouth movements) For Chris this was a fantastic effort on his part, getting into the nuance of the different sounds, it is quite a difficult task and is not easily achieved. It represents a dramatic change in his confidence levels.

Conclusion

The Tomatis Method improves the part of dyspraxia associated with motor planning disorder, for instance the way that the tongue moves in the mouth. It seems to works at fine-tuning the coordination of the different components of the mouth for the production of the appropriate sound. The TM immensely improves the comprehension and organization of the speech musculature and as such improves the voluntary production of sound. At the level of voice/sound production the TM helps children not to ‘grope’ so much, the tongue seems to find the right spot to form words more quickly and easily. The child's attempts at word production are more successful. The placement of the sound in the mouth is more precise.

The Tomatis Listening Program speeds up the pace of a child in understanding instruction and teaching. The integration of grammar in a child’s language learning process much faster. As well as this The TM speeds up and settles the re-patterning of the neurological parts of the brain associated with language by rewiring these pathways to the brain. The TM gets into the neurology and unblocks the whole system. It helps them to re-pattern when the pattern was not previously formed properly.

At the level of perception, which is often referred to as a more receptive process, children start to perceive sounds more accurately within a shorter space of time (3 instead of 6 weeks when working with a speech pathologist).

The “beauty of The Tomatis Method for children with dyspraxia” says Esther Bruhl, is that children can improve quickly without the need to struggle to achieve the right sounds. This also makes the process less repetitive for the speech therapist, so less frustrating for both. The TM also affects emotional and behavioural responses to life. Not only does it affect hearing and listening but by improving these skills and the organisation of a child’s responses in communication, it also decreases their frustration, implying less tantrums and disruptive behaviour.

For Tim by the end of the TLP there was less physical frustration in his attempts at producing sounds and words and as such less emotional frustration.

There is much more bodily control to be seen in a dyspraxic child who has undergone a Tomatis Listening Program.Fine and gross motor skills are considerably improved. Children learn to use these skills more appropriately and as such their physical abilities and their confidence in the use of these is much enhanced.

Benefits of the Tomatis Method

  • Words, in general, are more clearly spoken

  • Speech errors affecting vowels as well as consonants decrease. For instance, 'milk' might be pronounced 'mih', 'muh' or 'meh’.

  • The TM works at fine-tuning the coordination of the different components of the mouth for the production of the appropriate sound.

  • The TM immensely improves the comprehension and organisation of the speech musculature and as such improves the voluntary production of sound.

  • Social, emotional and physical and Behavior modifications

  • The TM reduces the anxiety in any communication task and increases the child’s confidence by being able to say what they want and need.

  • It modifies the organization of a child’s responses in communication.

In all the cases we have seen at the EARobic Centre™ in Sydney, within a few days of intensive ear stimulation with the Electronic Ear we have noticed the child’s language improving dramatically. The Tomatis Listening Program seems to modify the child’s behaviour in that it makes it easier for them to communicate, interrelate and develop their potential.

Our association with outside professionals such as speech therapists and occupational therapist has shown them how the TLP facilitates and speeds up their own work and has also produced some much-needed collaboration. This collaboration is very positive and effective for the best of the child and for the parents.

 
   
     

Suite 303, level 3, Edgecliff Centre, 203-233 New South Head Road, EDGECLIFF NSW 2027 Australia
Po Box 849 EDGECLIFF NSW 2027 Australia
Tel: + 61 2 9326 1650 Free toll: 1800 677 010 Fax: + 61 2 9362 5022    info@tomatis.com.au